jump to navigation

Who’s online, and what are they doing? July 30, 2007

Posted by Michael Sensiba in Demographics, Instant Messaging, SMS, Social Networking, Technology.
2 comments

This chart appeared on businessweek.com, June 11, 2007.

Excerpt:

More than 50% of U.S. online users, aged 12-26, are “joiners”, i.e., they use social networking sites.

 

Advertisements

Article: “Kids say e-mail is, like, soooo dead” July 30, 2007

Posted by Michael Sensiba in Email, Instant Messaging, SMS, Social Networking.
1 comment so far

In interviews with teen entrepreneurs at the Mashup 2007 conference, teens related their declining use of email, and even IM, in favor of text messaging and social networking sites (like MySpace and Facebook). See the article here.

Excerpt:

“[Martina Butler, the host of the teen podcast Emo Girl Talk] replied that she uses Facebook on her cell phone. “I need (Facebook) everywhere I go, but I log into e-mail only once a week,” she said.”

 

Is Email Obsolete for Millennials? October 10, 2006

Posted by Michael Sensiba in Email, Instant Messaging, SMS, Social Networking.
1 comment so far

An article in the Chronicle of Higher Education, “E-Mail is for Old People,” points out that college students rarely, if ever, check their campus email accounts. Students, often preferring contact through IM or their MySpace or Facebook accounts, eschew email as “too confusing” or for “old people”. They often treat email from their institutions as spam.

While email is not the only way to communicate electronically, it is still to be considered a serious tool. While IM is great for chatting with friends interactively, much serious work requires some forethought and composition of the message (including attachments). Email communication is, first and foremost, asynchronous. It allows communication at the time and choosing of the recipient. This choice permits the recipient to prioritize his/her time more easily than the tyranny of the ringing phone (land line or mobile) or popup message. And unlike some social networking sites, email communication is essentially non-public, which also lends itself to serious uses.

So why all the emphasis on the serious? Because much of the communication that today’s students will encounter in the “real world” will need to share the characteristics of email: asynchronous, non-public, and at least somewhat thought through. Other technologies will probably embrace some of these characteristics, but email isn’t going anywhere soon, so students might as well get comfortable with it.